mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Estimation Performance and Convergence Rate of the Generalized Power Method for Phase Synchronization

arXiv 1603.00211 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2016math.OC cs.NA math.NAcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An estimation problem of fundamental interest is that of phase synchronization, in which the goal is to recover a collection of phases using noisy measurements of relative phases. It is known that in the Gaussian noise setting, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) has an expected squared ℓ2-estimation error that is on the same order as the Cram'er-Rao lower bound. Moreover, even though the MLE is an optimal solution to a non-convex quadratic optimization problem, it can be found with high probability using semidefinite programming (SDP), provided that the noise power is not too large. In this paper, we study the estimation and convergence performance of a recently-proposed low-complexity alternative to the SDP-based approach, namely, the generalized power method (GPM). Our contribution is twofold. First, we bound the rate at which the estimation error decreases in each iteration of the GPM and use this bound to show that all iterates---not just the MLE---achieve an estimation error that is on the same order as the Cram'er-Rao bound. Our result holds under the least restrictive assumption on the noise power and gives the best provable bound on the estimation error known to date. It also implies that one can terminate the GPM at any iteration and still obtain an estimator that has a theoretical guarantee on its estimation error. Second, we show that under the same assumption on the noise power as that for the SDP-based method, the GPM will converge to the MLE at a linear rate with high probability. This answers a question raised in [3] and shows that the GPM is competitive in terms of both theoretical guarantees and numerical efficiency with the SDP-based method. At the heart of our convergence rate analysis is a new error bound for the non-convex quadratic optimization formulation of the phase synchronization problem, which could be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Generative Principal Component Analysiscited by 12
  2. 2021On the Local Linear Rate of Consensus on the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 8
  3. 2021Optimal Orthogonal Group Synchronization and Rotation Group Synchronizationcited by 4
  4. 2021Orthogonal Group Synchronization with Incomplete Measurements: Error Bounds and Linear Convergence of the Generalized Power Methodcited by 4
  5. 2021Non-Convex Joint Community Detection and Group Synchronization via Generalized Power Methodcited by 2
  6. 2023A Block Coordinate Descent Method for Nonsmooth Composite Optimization under Orthogonality Constraintscited by 2
  7. 2026NS-RGS: Newton-Schulz based Riemannian gradient method for orthogonal group synchronizationcited by 2
  8. 2021Generalized Orthogonal Procrustes Problem under Arbitrary Adversariescited by 1
  9. 2022Synthetic Principal Component Design: Fast Covariate Balancing with Synthetic Controlscited by 1
  10. 2023Decentralized Weakly Convex Optimization Over the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 1
  11. 2024Rotation Averaging: A Primal-Dual Method and Closed-Forms in Cycle Graphscited by 1
  12. 2026Dual Quaternion SE(3) Synchronization with Recovery Guaranteescited by 1
5 more
  1. 2021Recovering H"older smooth functions from noisy modulo samplescited by 0
  2. 2022Multi-Frequency Joint Community Detection and Phase Synchronizationcited by 0
  3. 2024Dynamic angular synchronization under smoothness constraintscited by 0
  4. 2024ℓ1-norm rank-one symmetric matrix factorization has no spurious second-order stationary pointscited by 0
  5. 2025A theoretical guarantee for SyncRankcited by 0