Maximum-a-posteriori estimation with Bayesian confidence regions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Solutions to inverse problems that are ill-conditioned or ill-posed may have significant intrinsic uncertainty. Unfortunately, analysing and quantifying this uncertainty is very challenging, particularly in high-dimensional problems. As a result, while most modern mathematical imaging methods produce impressive point estimation results, they are generally unable to quantify the uncertainty in the solutions delivered. This paper presents a new general methodology for approximating Bayesian high-posterior-density credibility regions in inverse problems that are convex and potentially very high-dimensional. The approximations are derived by using recent concentration of measure results related to information theory for log-concave random vectors. A remarkable property of the approximations is that they can be computed very efficiently, even in large-scale problems, by using standard convex optimisation techniques. In particular, they are available as a by-product in problems solved by maximum-a-posteriori estimation. The approximations also have favourable theoretical properties, namely they outer-bound the true high-posterior-density credibility regions, and they are stable with respect to model dimension. The proposed methodology is illustrated on two high-dimensional imaging inverse problems related to tomographic reconstruction and sparse deconvolution, where the approximations are used to perform Bayesian hypothesis tests and explore the uncertainty about the solutions, and where proximal Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms are used as benchmark to compute exact credible regions and measure the approximation error.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023Plug-and-Play split Gibbs sampler: embedding deep generative priors in Bayesian inferencecited by 42
- 2022On Maximum-a-Posteriori estimation with Plug & Play priors and stochastic gradient descentcited by 14
- 2022The split Gibbs sampler revisited: improvements to its algorithmic structure and augmented target distributioncited by 11
- 2025Diffusion at Absolute Zero: Langevin Sampling Using Successive Moreau Envelopes [conference paper]cited by 6
- 2021Patch-Based Image Restoration using Expectation Propagationcited by 4
- 2023Accelerated Bayesian imaging by relaxed proximal-point Langevin samplingcited by 4
- 2021Sparse online variational Bayesian regressioncited by 2
- 2021Fast Scalable Image Restoration using Total Variation Priors and Expectation Propagationcited by 1
- 2023Bayesian imaging inverse problem with SA-Roundtrip prior via HMC-pCN samplercited by 0
- 2025Hypothesis Testing in Imaging Inverse Problemscited by 0
- 2025Hypothesis Testing in Imaging Inverse Problems28 May 2025
- 2025Diffusion at Absolute Zero: Langevin Sampling Using Successive Moreau Envelopes [conference paper]3 Feb 2025
- 2023Bayesian imaging inverse problem with SA-Roundtrip prior via HMC-pCN sampler24 Oct 2023
- 2023Accelerated Bayesian imaging by relaxed proximal-point Langevin sampling18 Aug 2023
- 2023Plug-and-Play split Gibbs sampler: embedding deep generative priors in Bayesian inference21 Apr 2023
- 2022The split Gibbs sampler revisited: improvements to its algorithmic structure and augmented target distribution28 Jun 2022
- 2022On Maximum-a-Posteriori estimation with Plug & Play priors and stochastic gradient descent16 Jan 2022
- 2021Fast Scalable Image Restoration using Total Variation Priors and Expectation Propagation4 Oct 2021
- 2021Patch-Based Image Restoration using Expectation Propagation18 Jun 2021
- 2021Sparse online variational Bayesian regression24 Feb 2021