mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uniform Hypergraph Partitioning: Provable Tensor Methods and Sampling Techniques

arXiv 1602.06516 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2016cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a series of recent works, we have generalised the consistency results in the stochastic block model literature to the case of uniform and non-uniform hypergraphs. The present paper continues the same line of study, where we focus on partitioning weighted uniform hypergraphs---a problem often encountered in computer vision. This work is motivated by two issues that arise when a hypergraph partitioning approach is used to tackle computer vision problems: (i) The uniform hypergraphs constructed for higher-order learning contain all edges, but most have negligible weights. Thus, the adjacency tensor is nearly sparse, and yet, not binary. (ii) A more serious concern is that standard partitioning algorithms need to compute all edge weights, which is computationally expensive for hypergraphs. This is usually resolved in practice by merging the clustering algorithm with a tensor sampling strategy---an approach that is yet to be analysed rigorously. We build on our earlier work on partitioning dense unweighted uniform hypergraphs (Ghoshdastidar and Dukkipati, ICML, 2015), and address the aforementioned issues by proposing provable and efficient partitioning algorithms. Our analysis justifies the empirical success of practical sampling techniques. We also complement our theoretical findings by elaborate empirical comparison of various hypergraph partitioning schemes.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: