Adversarial Top-K Ranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the top-K ranking problem where the goal is to recover the set of top-K ranked items out of a large collection of items based on partially revealed preferences. We consider an adversarial crowdsourced setting where there are two population sets, and pairwise comparison samples drawn from one of the populations follow the standard Bradley-Terry-Luce model (i.e., the chance of item i beating item j is proportional to the relative score of item i to item j), while in the other population, the corresponding chance is inversely proportional to the relative score. When the relative size of the two populations is known, we characterize the minimax limit on the sample size required (up to a constant) for reliably identifying the top-K items, and demonstrate how it scales with the relative size. Moreover, by leveraging a tensor decomposition method for disambiguating mixture distributions, we extend our result to the more realistic scenario in which the relative population size is unknown, thus establishing an upper bound on the fundamental limit of the sample size for recovering the top-K set.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problemscited by 19
- 2022Byzantine Spectral Rankingcited by 5
- 2022Ranking with Confidence for Large Scale Comparison Datacited by 3
- 2024Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankingscited by 1
- 2024Rate-Optimal Rank Aggregation with Private Pairwise Rankings26 Feb 2024
- 2022Byzantine Spectral Ranking15 Nov 2022
- 2022Ranking with Confidence for Large Scale Comparison Data3 Feb 2022
- 2021Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems1 Oct 2021