k-variates++: more pluses in the k-means++
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
k-means++ seeding has become a de facto standard for hard clustering algorithms. In this paper, our first contribution is a two-way generalisation of this seeding, k-variates++, that includes the sampling of general densities rather than just a discrete set of Dirac densities anchored at the point locations, and a generalisation of the well known Arthur-Vassilvitskii (AV) approximation guarantee, in the form of a bias+variance approximation bound of the global optimum. This approximation exhibits a reduced dependency on the "noise" component with respect to the optimal potential --- actually approaching the statistical lower bound. We show that k-variates++ reduces to efficient (biased seeding) clustering algorithms tailored to specific frameworks; these include distributed, streaming and on-line clustering, with direct approximation results for these algorithms. Finally, we present a novel application of k-variates++ to differential privacy. For either the specific frameworks considered here, or for the differential privacy setting, there is little to no prior results on the direct application of k-means++ and its approximation bounds --- state of the art contenders appear to be significantly more complex and / or display less favorable (approximation) properties. We stress that our algorithms can still be run in cases where there is textitno closed form solution for the population minimizer. We demonstrate the applicability of our analysis via experimental evaluation on several domains and settings, displaying competitive performances vs state of the art.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Roundcited by 19
- 2021Differentially-Private Clustering of Easy Instancescited by 17
- 2022Scalable Differentially Private Clustering via Hierarchically Separated Treescited by 10
- 2022k-Median Clustering via Metric Embedding: Towards Better Initialization with Differential Privacycited by 4
- 2021Differentially Private Algorithms for Clustering with Stability Assumptionscited by 1
- 2026On the Optimal Number of Grids for Differentially Private Non-Interactive K-Means Clusteringcited by 0
- 2026On the Optimal Number of Grids for Differentially Private Non-Interactive K-Means Clustering27 Mar 2026
- 2022k-Median Clustering via Metric Embedding: Towards Better Initialization with Differential Privacy26 Jun 2022
- 2022Scalable Differentially Private Clustering via Hierarchically Separated Trees17 Jun 2022
- 2021Differentially-Private Clustering of Easy Instances29 Dec 2021
- 2021Differentially Private Algorithms for Clustering with Stability Assumptions11 Jun 2021
- 2021Locally Private k-Means in One Round20 Apr 2021