mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation

arXiv 1602.01059 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2016cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Argumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A way to compare them consists in using a ranking-based semantics which rank-order arguments from the most to the least acceptable ones. Recently, a number of such semantics have been proposed independently, often associated with some desirable properties. However, there is no comparative study which takes a broader perspective. This is what we propose in this work. We provide a general comparison of all these semantics with respect to the proposed properties. That allows to underline the differences of behavior between the existing semantics.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: