mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Average Stability is Invariant to Data Preconditioning. Implications to Exp-concave Empirical Risk Minimization

arXiv 1601.04011 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2016cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that the average stability notion introduced by citekearns1999algorithmic, bousquet2002stability is invariant to data preconditioning, for a wide class of generalized linear models that includes most of the known exp-concave losses. In other words, when analyzing the stability rate of a given algorithm, we may assume the optimal preconditioning of the data. This implies that, at least from a statistical perspective, explicit regularization is not required in order to compensate for ill-conditioned data, which stands in contrast to a widely common approach that includes a regularization for analyzing the sample complexity of generalized linear models. Several important implications of our findings include: a) We demonstrate that the excess risk of empirical risk minimization (ERM) is controlled by the preconditioned stability rate. This immediately yields a relatively short and elegant proof for the fast rates attained by ERM in our context. b) We strengthen the recent bounds of citehardt2015train on the stability rate of the Stochastic Gradient Descent algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.