The Utility of Abstaining in Binary Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore the problem of binary classification in machine learning, with a twist - the classifier is allowed to abstain on any datum, professing ignorance about the true class label without committing to any prediction. This is directly motivated by applications like medical diagnosis and fraud risk assessment, in which incorrect predictions have potentially calamitous consequences. We focus on a recent spate of theoretically driven work in this area that characterizes how allowing abstentions can lead to fewer errors in very general settings. Two areas are highlighted: the surprising possibility of zero-error learning, and the fundamental tradeoff between predicting sufficiently often and avoiding incorrect predictions. We review efficient algorithms with provable guarantees for each of these areas. We also discuss connections to other scenarios, notably active learning, as they suggest promising directions of further inquiry in this emerging field.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Rule-Based Modelscited by 0
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification for Rule-Based Models3 Nov 2022