mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-Local Probes Do Not Help with Graph Problems

arXiv 1512.05411 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2015cs.DScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part of the input, while in distributed algorithms nodes can only communicate with their immediate neighbours. We show that for a large class of graph problems, this extra freedom does not help centralised algorithms at all: for example, efficient stateless deterministic centralised local algorithms can be simulated with efficient distributed message-passing algorithms. In particular, this enables us to transfer existing lower bound results from distributed algorithms to centralised local algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.