mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Polynomial Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity

arXiv 1511.05053 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2015cs.CC cs.DM cs.DScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that every algorithm for testing n-variate Boolean functions for monotonicity must have query complexity tildeOmega(n1/4). All previous lower bounds for this problem were designed for non-adaptive algorithms and, as a result, the best previous lower bound for general (possibly adaptive) monotonicity testers was only Omega(log n). Combined with the query complexity of the non-adaptive monotonicity tester of Khot, Minzer, and Safra (FOCS 2015), our lower bound shows that adaptivity can result in at most a quadratic reduction in the query complexity for testing monotonicity. By contrast, we show that there is an exponential gap between the query complexity of adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms for testing regular linear threshold functions (LTFs) for monotonicity. Chen, De, Servedio, and Tan (STOC 2015) recently showed that non-adaptive algorithms require almost Omega(n1/2) queries for this task. We introduce a new adaptive monotonicity testing algorithm which has query complexity O(log n) when the input is a regular LTF.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.