mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Complete Dictionary Recovery over the Sphere II: Recovery by Riemannian Trust-region Method

arXiv 1511.04777 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2015cs.IT cs.CV math.ITcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of recovering a complete (i.e., square and invertible) matrix mathbf A0, from mathbf Y ∈ ℝn × p with mathbf Y = mathbf A0 mathbf X0, provided mathbf X0 is sufficiently sparse. This recovery problem is central to theoretical understanding of dictionary learning, which seeks a sparse representation for a collection of input signals and finds numerous applications in modern signal processing and machine learning. We give the first efficient algorithm that provably recovers mathbf A0 when mathbf X0 has O(n) nonzeros per column, under suitable probability model for mathbf X0. Our algorithmic pipeline centers around solving a certain nonconvex optimization problem with a spherical constraint, and hence is naturally phrased in the language of manifold optimization. In a companion paper (arXiv:1511.03607), we have showed that with high probability our nonconvex formulation has no "spurious" local minimizers and around any saddle point the objective function has a negative directional curvature. In this paper, we take advantage of the particular geometric structure, and describe a Riemannian trust region algorithm that provably converges to a local minimizer with from arbitrary initializations. Such minimizers give excellent approximations to rows of mathbf X0. The rows are then recovered by linear programming rounding and deflation.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 6; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 226
  2. 2022Neural Collapse with Normalized Features: A Geometric Analysis over the Riemannian Manifoldcited by 50
  3. 2021Scaling and Scalability: Provable Nonconvex Low-Rank Tensor Estimation from Incomplete Measurementscited by 28
  4. 2023Neural Collapse in Multi-label Learning with Pick-all-label Losscited by 14
  5. 2021On Riemannian Stochastic Approximation Schemes with Fixed Step-Sizecited by 12
  6. 2022First-Order Algorithms for Min-Max Optimization in Geodesic Metric Spacescited by 10
  7. 2023Riemannian stochastic optimization methods avoid strict saddle pointscited by 8
  8. 2022Optimal Regularization for a Data Sourcecited by 6
  9. 2021No-go Theorem for Acceleration in the Hyperbolic Planecited by 4
  10. 2022Accelerated Riemannian Optimization: Handling Constraints with a Prox to Bound Geometric Penaltiescited by 4
  11. 2022Dictionary Learning for the Almost-Linear Sparsity Regimecited by 3
  12. 2024Multilinear Kernel Regression and Imputation via Manifold Learningcited by 3
12 more
  1. 2025SPEAR++: Scaling Gradient Inversion via Sparsely-Used Dictionary Learningcited by 3
  2. 2021Efficient Sparse Coding using Hierarchical Riemannian Pursuitcited by 2
  3. 2022A Riemannian ADMMcited by 2
  4. 2023Last-Iterate Convergence of Adaptive Riemannian Gradient Descent for Equilibrium Computationcited by 2
  5. 2021Non-Convex Compressed Sensing with Training Datacited by 1
  6. 2023Convergence of alternating minimisation algorithms for dictionary learningcited by 1
  7. 2024Streamlining in the Riemannian Realm: Efficient Riemannian Optimization with Loopless Variance Reductioncited by 1
  8. 2024Learning-Rate-Free Stochastic Optimization over Riemannian Manifoldscited by 1
  9. 2025Finite-Time Analysis of Stochastic Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimization on the Riemannian Manifoldscited by 1
  10. 2021Online Orthogonal Dictionary Learning Based on Frank-Wolfe Methodcited by 0
  11. 2023Learning Trees of ℓ0-Minimization Problemscited by 0
  12. 2025Sharper Convergence Rates for Nonconvex Optimisation via Reduction Mappingscited by 0