An Action Language for Multi-Agent Domains: Foundations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-agent domains (MADs), an agent's action may not just change the world and the agent's knowledge and beliefs about the world, but also may change other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world and their knowledge and beliefs about other agents' knowledge and beliefs about the world. The goals of an agent in a multi-agent world may involve manipulating the knowledge and beliefs of other agents' and again, not just their knowledge/belief about the world, but also their knowledge about other agents' knowledge about the world. Our goal is to present an action language (mA+) that has the necessary features to address the above aspects in representing and RAC in MADs. mA+ allows the representation of and reasoning about different types of actions that an agent can perform in a domain where many other agents might be present -- such as world-altering actions, sensing actions, and announcement/communication actions. It also allows the specification of agents' dynamic awareness of action occurrences which has future implications on what agents' know about the world and other agents' knowledge about the world. mA+ considers three different types of awareness: full-, partial- awareness, and complete oblivion of an action occurrence and its effects. This keeps the language simple, yet powerful enough to address a large variety of knowledge manipulation scenarios in MADs. The semantics of mA+ relies on the notion of state, which is described by a pointed Kripke model and is used to encode the agent's knowledge and the real state of the world. It is defined by a transition function that maps pairs of actions and states into sets of states. We illustrate properties of the action theories, including properties that guarantee finiteness of the set of initial states and their practical implementability. Finally, we relate mA+ to other related formalisms that contribute to RAC in MADs.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021E-PDDL: A Standardized Way of Defining Epistemic Planning Problemscited by 2
- 2023A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version)cited by 2
- 2021Comprehensive Multi-Agent Epistemic Planningcited by 1
- 2023DELPHIC: Practical DEL Planning via Possibilities (Extended Version)cited by 0
- 2024Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planningcited by 0
- 2026A Study of Belief Revision Postulates in Multi-Agent Systems (Extended Version)cited by 0
- 2026A Study of Belief Revision Postulates in Multi-Agent Systems (Extended Version)4 May 2026
- 2024Depth-Bounded Epistemic Planning3 Jun 2024
- 2023A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version)28 Jul 2023
- 2023DELPHIC: Practical DEL Planning via Possibilities (Extended Version)28 Jul 2023
- 2021Comprehensive Multi-Agent Epistemic Planning17 Sep 2021
- 2021E-PDDL: A Standardized Way of Defining Epistemic Planning Problems19 Jul 2021