Computational models: Bottom-up and top-down aspects
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computational models of visual attention have become popular over the past decade, we believe primarily for two reasons: First, models make testable predictions that can be explored by experimentalists as well as theoreticians, second, models have practical and technological applications of interest to the applied science and engineering communities. In this chapter, we take a critical look at recent attention modeling efforts. We focus on em computational models of attention as defined by Tsotsos & Rothenstein shortciteTsotsosRothenstein11: Models which can process any visual stimulus (typically, an image or video clip), which can possibly also be given some task definition, and which make predictions that can be compared to human or animal behavioral or physiological responses elicited by the same stimulus and task. Thus, we here place less emphasis on abstract models, phenomenological models, purely data-driven fitting or extrapolation models, or models specifically designed for a single task or for a restricted class of stimuli. For theoretical models, we refer the reader to a number of previous reviews that address attention theories and models more generally citeIttiKoch01nrn,Palettaetal05,Frintropetal10,RothensteinTsotsos08,GottliebBalan10,Toet11,BorjiItti12pami.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
- 2021A Dataset for Provident Vehicle Detection at Nightcited by 3
- 2021A Dataset for Provident Vehicle Detection at Night27 May 2021