mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Batch Normalized Recurrent Neural Networks

arXiv 1510.01378 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2015stat.ML cs.LG cs.NEcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are powerful models for sequential data that have the potential to learn long-term dependencies. However, they are computationally expensive to train and difficult to parallelize. Recent work has shown that normalizing intermediate representations of neural networks can significantly improve convergence rates in feedforward neural networks . In particular, batch normalization, which uses mini-batch statistics to standardize features, was shown to significantly reduce training time. In this paper, we show that applying batch normalization to the hidden-to-hidden transitions of our RNNs doesn't help the training procedure. We also show that when applied to the input-to-hidden transitions, batch normalization can lead to a faster convergence of the training criterion but doesn't seem to improve the generalization performance on both our language modelling and speech recognition tasks. All in all, applying batch normalization to RNNs turns out to be more challenging than applying it to feedforward networks, but certain variants of it can still be beneficial.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort: