mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Validity of time reversal for testing Granger causality

arXiv 1509.07636 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2015math.ST stat.ML stat.THcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inferring causal interactions from observed data is a challenging problem, especially in the presence of measurement noise. To alleviate the problem of spurious causality, Haufe et al. (2013) proposed to contrast measures of information flow obtained on the original data against the same measures obtained on time-reversed data. They show that this procedure, time-reversed Granger causality (TRGC), robustly rejects causal interpretations on mixtures of independent signals. While promising results have been achieved in simulations, it was so far unknown whether time reversal leads to valid measures of information flow in the presence of true interaction. Here we prove that, for linear finite-order autoregressive processes with unidirectional information flow, the application of time reversal for testing Granger causality indeed leads to correct estimates of information flow and its directionality. Using simulations, we further show that TRGC is able to infer correct directionality with similar statistical power as the net Granger causality between two variables, while being much more robust to the presence of measurement noise.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

4 papers.