A Compositional Explanation of the Pet Fish Phenomenon
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The `pet fish' phenomenon is often cited as a paradigm example of the `non-compositionality' of human concept use. We show here how this phenomenon is naturally accommodated within a compositional distributional model of meaning. This model describes the meaning of a composite concept by accounting for interaction between its constituents via their grammatical roles. We give two illustrative examples to show how the qualitative phenomena are exhibited. We go on to apply the model to experimental data, and finally discuss extensions of the formalism.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Composing Conversational Negationcited by 7
- 2021A Categorical Semantics of Fuzzy Concepts in Conceptual Spacescited by 4
- 2024Grounded learning for compositional vector semanticscited by 0
- 2024Grounded learning for compositional vector semantics10 Jan 2024
- 2021A Categorical Semantics of Fuzzy Concepts in Conceptual Spaces12 Oct 2021
- 2021Composing Conversational Negation14 Jul 2021