Insurance Premium Prediction via Gradient Tree-Boosted Tweedie Compound Poisson Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Tweedie GLM is a widely used method for predicting insurance premiums. However, the structure of the logarithmic mean is restricted to a linear form in the Tweedie GLM, which can be too rigid for many applications. As a better alternative, we propose a gradient tree-boosting algorithm and apply it to Tweedie compound Poisson models for pure premiums. We use a profile likelihood approach to estimate the index and dispersion parameters. Our method is capable of fitting a flexible nonlinear Tweedie model and capturing complex interactions among predictors. A simulation study confirms the excellent prediction performance of our method. As an application, we apply our method to an auto insurance claim data and show that the new method is superior to the existing methods in the sense that it generates more accurate premium predictions, thus helping solve the adverse selection issue. We have implemented our method in a user-friendly R package that also includes a nice visualization tool for interpreting the fitted model.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 85
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2023Neural networks for insurance pricing with frequency and severity data: a benchmark study from data preprocessing to technical tariffcited by 7
- 2022Langevin dynamics based algorithm e-THvarepsilonO POULA for stochastic optimization problems with discontinuous stochastic gradientcited by 5
- 2023Enhanced Gradient Boosting for Zero-Inflated Insurance Claims and Comparative Analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBMcited by 5
- 2024Why You Should Not Trust Interpretations in Machine Learning: Adversarial Attacks on Partial Dependence Plotscited by 5
- 2022Personalized Promotion Decision Making Based on Direct and Enduring Effect Predictionscited by 4
- 2021Global-Local Item Embedding for Temporal Set Predictioncited by 1
- 2024Bayesian CART models for aggregate claim modelingcited by 1
- 2025Distribution-free inference for LightGBM and GLM with Tweedie losscited by 1
- 2025From Noise to Precision: A Diffusion-Driven Approach to Zero-Inflated Precipitation Predictioncited by 0
- 2025From Noise to Precision: A Diffusion-Driven Approach to Zero-Inflated Precipitation Prediction1 Sep 2025
- 2025Distribution-free inference for LightGBM and GLM with Tweedie loss9 Jul 2025
- 2024Bayesian CART models for aggregate claim modeling3 Sep 2024
- 2024Why You Should Not Trust Interpretations in Machine Learning: Adversarial Attacks on Partial Dependence Plots29 Apr 2024
- 2023Neural networks for insurance pricing with frequency and severity data: a benchmark study from data preprocessing to technical tariff19 Oct 2023
- 2023Enhanced Gradient Boosting for Zero-Inflated Insurance Claims and Comparative Analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM15 Jul 2023
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making14 Jan 2023
- 2022Langevin dynamics based algorithm e-THvarepsilonO POULA for stochastic optimization problems with discontinuous stochastic gradient24 Oct 2022
- 2022Personalized Promotion Decision Making Based on Direct and Enduring Effect Predictions23 Jul 2022
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies21 Dec 2021
- 2021Global-Local Item Embedding for Temporal Set Prediction5 Sep 2021