On the Importance of Normalisation Layers in Deep Learning with Piecewise Linear Activation Units
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep feedforward neural networks with piecewise linear activations are currently producing the state-of-the-art results in several public datasets. The combination of deep learning models and piecewise linear activation functions allows for the estimation of exponentially complex functions with the use of a large number of subnetworks specialized in the classification of similar input examples. During the training process, these subnetworks avoid overfitting with an implicit regularization scheme based on the fact that they must share their parameters with other subnetworks. Using this framework, we have made an empirical observation that can improve even more the performance of such models. We notice that these models assume a balanced initial distribution of data points with respect to the domain of the piecewise linear activation function. If that assumption is violated, then the piecewise linear activation units can degenerate into purely linear activation units, which can result in a significant reduction of their capacity to learn complex functions. Furthermore, as the number of model layers increases, this unbalanced initial distribution makes the model ill-conditioned. Therefore, we propose the introduction of batch normalisation units into deep feedforward neural networks with piecewise linear activations, which drives a more balanced use of these activation units, where each region of the activation function is trained with a relatively large proportion of training samples. Also, this batch normalisation promotes the pre-conditioning of very deep learning models. We show that by introducing maxout and batch normalisation units to the network in network model results in a model that produces classification results that are better than or comparable to the current state of the art in CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, MNIST, and SVHN datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Towards Understanding Neural Collapse: The Effects of Batch Normalization and Weight Decaycited by 9
- 2021Automated Olfactory Bulb Segmentation on High Resolutional T2-Weighted MRIcited by 2
- 2021Signature-Graph Networkscited by 1
- 2021GCCN: Global Context Convolutional Networkcited by 1
- 2023Pruning Distorted Images in MNIST Handwritten Digitscited by 0
- 2025Shrinkage Initialization for Smooth Learning of Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Shrinkage Initialization for Smooth Learning of Neural Networks12 Apr 2025
- 2023Towards Understanding Neural Collapse: The Effects of Batch Normalization and Weight Decay9 Sep 2023
- 2023Pruning Distorted Images in MNIST Handwritten Digits26 May 2023
- 2021GCCN: Global Context Convolutional Network22 Oct 2021
- 2021Signature-Graph Networks22 Oct 2021
- 2021Automated Olfactory Bulb Segmentation on High Resolutional T2-Weighted MRI9 Aug 2021