On the Worst-Case Approximability of Sparse PCA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is well known that Sparse PCA (Sparse Principal Component Analysis) is NP-hard to solve exactly on worst-case instances. What is the complexity of solving Sparse PCA approximately? Our contributions include: 1) a simple and efficient algorithm that achieves an n-1/3-approximation; 2) NP-hardness of approximation to within (1-varepsilon), for some small constant varepsilon > 0; 3) SSE-hardness of approximation to within any constant factor; and 4) an expexpleft(Omegaleft(√log log nright)right) ("quasi-quasi-polynomial") gap for the standard semidefinite program.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2026A Decomposition Framework for Certifiably Optimal Orthogonal Sparse PCA1 Mar 2026
- 2025sparseGeoHOPCA: A Geometric Solution to Sparse Higher-Order PCA Without Covariance Estimation10 Jun 2025
- 2024Efficient Sparse PCA via Block-Diagonalization18 Oct 2024
- 2022Sparse PCA on fixed-rank matrices7 Jan 2022