VEWS: A Wikipedia Vandal Early Warning System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of detecting vandals on Wikipedia before any human or known vandalism detection system reports flagging potential vandals so that such users can be presented early to Wikipedia administrators. We leverage multiple classical ML approaches, but develop 3 novel sets of features. Our Wikipedia Vandal Behavior (WVB) approach uses a novel set of user editing patterns as features to classify some users as vandals. Our Wikipedia Transition Probability Matrix (WTPM) approach uses a set of features derived from a transition probability matrix and then reduces it via a neural net auto-encoder to classify some users as vandals. The VEWS approach merges the previous two approaches. Without using any information (e.g. reverts) provided by other users, these algorithms each have over 85% classification accuracy. Moreover, when temporal recency is considered, accuracy goes to almost 90%. We carry out detailed experiments on a new data set we have created consisting of about 33K Wikipedia users (including both a black list and a white list of editors) and containing 770K edits. We describe specific behaviors that distinguish between vandals and non-vandals. We show that VEWS beats ClueBot NG and STiki, the best known algorithms today for vandalism detection. Moreover, VEWS detects far more vandals than ClueBot NG and on average, detects them 2.39 edits before ClueBot NG when both detect the vandal. However, we show that the combination of VEWS and ClueBot NG can give a fully automated vandal early warning system with even higher accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Rank List Sensitivity of Recommender Systems to Interaction Perturbationscited by 20
- 2021PETGEN: Personalized Text Generation Attack on Deep Sequence Embedding-based Classification Modelscited by 17
- 2024Node-Time Conditional Prompt Learning In Dynamic Graphscited by 11
- 2022Signed Graph Neural Networks: A Frequency Perspectivecited by 10
- 2024SGPT: Few-Shot Prompt Tuning for Signed Graphscited by 6
- 2022Attention-Based Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMapcited by 2
- 2022RuDi: Explaining Behavior Sequence Models by Automatic Statistics Generation and Rule Distillationcited by 1
- 2023Robust Fraud Detection via Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 1
- 2024Interpretable classification of wiki-review streamscited by 1
- 2024Hoaxpedia: A Unified Wikipedia Hoax Articles Datasetcited by 0
- 2025ROBAD: Robust Adversary-aware Local-Global Attended Bad Actor Detection Sequential Modelcited by 0
- 2025Event-Aware Prompt Learning for Dynamic Graphscited by 0
- 2025Event-Aware Prompt Learning for Dynamic Graphs13 Oct 2025
- 2025ROBAD: Robust Adversary-aware Local-Global Attended Bad Actor Detection Sequential Model20 Jul 2025
- 2024SGPT: Few-Shot Prompt Tuning for Signed Graphs11 Dec 2024
- 2024Interpretable classification of wiki-review streams28 May 2024
- 2024Node-Time Conditional Prompt Learning In Dynamic Graphs22 May 2024
- 2024Hoaxpedia: A Unified Wikipedia Hoax Articles Dataset3 May 2024
- 2023Robust Fraud Detection via Supervised Contrastive Learning19 Aug 2023
- 2022Signed Graph Neural Networks: A Frequency Perspective15 Aug 2022
- 2022RuDi: Explaining Behavior Sequence Models by Automatic Statistics Generation and Rule Distillation12 Aug 2022
- 2022Rank List Sensitivity of Recommender Systems to Interaction Perturbations29 Jan 2022
- 2022Attention-Based Vandalism Detection in OpenStreetMap25 Jan 2022
- 2021PETGEN: Personalized Text Generation Attack on Deep Sequence Embedding-based Classification Models14 Sep 2021