Prophet Secretary
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimal stopping theory is a powerful tool for analyzing scenarios such as online auctions in which we generally require optimizing an objective function over the space of stopping rules for an allocation process under uncertainty. Perhaps the most classic problems of stopping theory are the prophet inequality problem and the secretary problem. The classical prophet inequality states that by choosing the same threshold OPT/2 for every step, one can achieve the tight competitive ratio of 0.5. On the other hand, for the basic secretary problem, the optimal strategy achieves the tight competitive ratio of 1/e. In this paper, we introduce Prophet Secretary, a natural combination of the prophet inequality and the secretary problems. An example motivation for our problem is as follows. Consider a seller that has an item to sell on the market to a set of arriving customers. The seller knows the types of customers that may be interested in the item and he has a price distribution for each type: the price offered by a customer of a type is anticipated to be drawn from the corresponding distribution. However, the customers arrive in a random order. Upon the arrival of a customer, the seller makes an irrevocable decision whether to sell the item at the offered price. We address the question of finding a strategy for selling the item at a high price. We show that by using a uniform threshold one cannot break the 0.5 barrier. However, we show that i) using n distinct non-adaptive thresholds one can obtain a competitive ratio that goes to (1-1/e) as n grows; and ii) no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than 0.75. Our results improve the (asymptotic) approximation guarantee of single-item sequential posted pricing mechanisms from 0.5 to (1-1/e) when the order of agents (customers) is chosen randomly.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Degeneracy is OK: Logarithmic Regret for Network Revenue Management with Indiscrete Distributionscited by 13
- 2024Fair Secretaries with Unfair Predictionscited by 4
- 2021Online Adversarial Attackscited by 3
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Ordercited by 2
- 2025Budgeted Online Active Learning with Expert Advice and Episodic Priorscited by 1
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlationscited by 0
- 2026The Secretary Problem with Predictions and a Chosen Order12 Jan 2026
- 2025Budgeted Online Active Learning with Expert Advice and Episodic Priors3 Jun 2025
- 2024Fair Secretaries with Unfair Predictions15 Nov 2024
- 2024The Competition Complexity of Prophet Inequalities with Correlations10 Sep 2024
- 2022Degeneracy is OK: Logarithmic Regret for Network Revenue Management with Indiscrete Distributions14 Oct 2022
- 2021Online Adversarial Attacks2 Mar 2021