Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we first discuss the definition of modularity (Q) used as a metric for community quality and then we review the modularity maximization approaches which were used for community detection in the last decade. Then, we discuss two opposite yet coexisting problems of modularity optimization: in some cases, it tends to favor small communities over large ones while in others, large communities over small ones (so called the resolution limit problem). Next, we overview several community quality metrics proposed to solve the resolution limit problem and discuss Modularity Density (Qds) which simultaneously avoids the two problems of modularity. Finally, we introduce two novel fine-tuned community detection algorithms that iteratively attempt to improve the community quality measurements by splitting and merging the given network community structure. The first of them, referred to as Fine-tuned Q, is based on modularity (Q) while the second one is based on Modularity Density (Qds) and denoted as Fine-tuned Qds. Then, we compare the greedy algorithm of modularity maximization (denoted as Greedy Q), Fine-tuned Q, and Fine-tuned Qds on four real networks, and also on the classical clique network and the LFR benchmark networks, each of which is instantiated by a wide range of parameters. The results indicate that Fine-tuned Qds is the most effective among the three algorithms discussed. Moreover, we show that Fine-tuned Qds can be applied to the communities detected by other algorithms to significantly improve their results.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023A Comprehensive Review of Community Detection in Graphscited by 12
- 2026Let There Be Claws: An Early Social Network Analysis of AI Agents on Moltbookcited by 5
- 2021A Survey on Role-Oriented Network Embeddingcited by 4
- 2021Hide and Seek: Outwitting Community Detection Algorithmscited by 2
- 2022Community detection in multiplex networks based on orthogonal nonnegative matrix tri-factorizationcited by 2
- 2023DSCom: A Data-Driven Self-Adaptive Community-Based Framework for Influence Maximization in Social Networkscited by 1
- 2022Towards Understanding the Link Between Modularity and Performance in Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2022Trading off Quality for Efficiency of Community Detection: An Inductive Method across Graphscited by 0
- 2023Localizing and Assessing Node Significance in Default Mode Network using Sub-Community Detection in Mild Cognitive Impairmentcited by 0
- 2025Urban delineation through the lens of commute networks: Leveraging graph embeddings to distinguish socioeconomic groups in citiescited by 0
- 2026Let There Be Claws: An Early Social Network Analysis of AI Agents on Moltbook23 Feb 2026
- 2025Urban delineation through the lens of commute networks: Leveraging graph embeddings to distinguish socioeconomic groups in cities15 Jul 2025
- 2023Localizing and Assessing Node Significance in Default Mode Network using Sub-Community Detection in Mild Cognitive Impairment4 Dec 2023
- 2023DSCom: A Data-Driven Self-Adaptive Community-Based Framework for Influence Maximization in Social Networks18 Nov 2023
- 2023A Comprehensive Review of Community Detection in Graphs21 Sep 2023
- 2022Trading off Quality for Efficiency of Community Detection: An Inductive Method across Graphs29 Sep 2022
- 2022Towards Understanding the Link Between Modularity and Performance in Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learning13 May 2022
- 2022Community detection in multiplex networks based on orthogonal nonnegative matrix tri-factorization2 May 2022
- 2021A Survey on Role-Oriented Network Embedding18 Jul 2021
- 2021Hide and Seek: Outwitting Community Detection Algorithms22 Feb 2021