The local convexity of solving systems of quadratic equations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper considers the recovery of a rank r positive semidefinite matrix X XT∈ℝn× n from m scalar measurements of the form yi := aiT X XT ai (i.e., quadratic measurements of X). Such problems arise in a variety of applications, including covariance sketching of high-dimensional data streams, quadratic regression, quantum state tomography, among others. A natural approach to this problem is to minimize the loss function f(U) = sumi (yi - aiTUUTai)2 which has an entire manifold of solutions given by XOO∈Or where Or is the orthogonal group of r× r orthogonal matrices; this is it non-convex in the n× r matrix U, but methods like gradient descent are simple and easy to implement (as compared to semidefinite relaxation approaches). In this paper we show that once we have m ≥ C nr log2(n) samples from isotropic gaussian ai, with high probability em (a) this function admits a dimension-independent region of em local strong convexity on lines perpendicular to the solution manifold, and em (b) with an additional polynomial factor of r samples, a simple spectral initialization will land within the region of convexity with high probability. Together, this implies that gradient descent with initialization (but no re-sampling) will converge linearly to the correct X, up to an orthogonal transformation. We believe that this general technique (local convexity reachable by spectral initialization) should prove applicable to a broader class of nonconvex optimization problems.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3.
6 papers.
- 2023Convergence of Alternating Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorizationcited by 12
- 2022Sudakov-Fernique post-AMP, and a new proof of the local convexity of the TAP free energycited by 9
- 2023Continuized Acceleration for Quasar Convex Functions in Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 6
- 2021Nonconvex Factorization and Manifold Formulations are Almost Equivalent in Low-rank Matrix Optimizationcited by 4
- 2022Error Bound of Empirical ℓ2 Risk Minimization for Noisy Standard and Generalized Phase Retrieval Problemscited by 2
- 2023Acceleration and Implicit Regularization in Gaussian Phase Retrievalcited by 1
- 2023Acceleration and Implicit Regularization in Gaussian Phase Retrieval21 Nov 2023
- 2023Convergence of Alternating Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization11 May 2023
- 2023Continuized Acceleration for Quasar Convex Functions in Non-Convex Optimization15 Feb 2023
- 2022Sudakov-Fernique post-AMP, and a new proof of the local convexity of the TAP free energy19 Aug 2022
- 2022Error Bound of Empirical ℓ2 Risk Minimization for Noisy Standard and Generalized Phase Retrieval Problems27 May 2022
- 2021Nonconvex Factorization and Manifold Formulations are Almost Equivalent in Low-rank Matrix Optimization3 Aug 2021