mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The local convexity of solving systems of quadratic equations

arXiv 1506.07868 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2015math.NA cs.NA math.OCcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper considers the recovery of a rank r positive semidefinite matrix X XT∈ℝn× n from m scalar measurements of the form yi := aiT X XT ai (i.e., quadratic measurements of X). Such problems arise in a variety of applications, including covariance sketching of high-dimensional data streams, quadratic regression, quantum state tomography, among others. A natural approach to this problem is to minimize the loss function f(U) = sumi (yi - aiTUUTai)2 which has an entire manifold of solutions given by XOO∈Or where Or is the orthogonal group of r× r orthogonal matrices; this is it non-convex in the n× r matrix U, but methods like gradient descent are simple and easy to implement (as compared to semidefinite relaxation approaches). In this paper we show that once we have m ≥ C nr log2(n) samples from isotropic gaussian ai, with high probability em (a) this function admits a dimension-independent region of em local strong convexity on lines perpendicular to the solution manifold, and em (b) with an additional polynomial factor of r samples, a simple spectral initialization will land within the region of convexity with high probability. Together, this implies that gradient descent with initialization (but no re-sampling) will converge linearly to the correct X, up to an orthogonal transformation. We believe that this general technique (local convexity reachable by spectral initialization) should prove applicable to a broader class of nonconvex optimization problems.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3.

6 papers.