CamFlow: Managed Data-sharing for Cloud Services
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A model of cloud services is emerging whereby a few trusted providers manage the underlying hardware and communications whereas many companies build on this infrastructure to offer higher level, cloud-hosted PaaS services and/or SaaS applications. From the start, strong isolation between cloud tenants was seen to be of paramount importance, provided first by virtual machines (VM) and later by containers, which share the operating system (OS) kernel. Increasingly it is the case that applications also require facilities to effect isolation and protection of data managed by those applications. They also require flexible data sharing with other applications, often across the traditional cloud-isolation boundaries; for example, when government provides many related services for its citizens on a common platform. Similar considerations apply to the end-users of applications. But in particular, the incorporation of cloud services within `Internet of Things' architectures is driving the requirements for both protection and cross-application data sharing. These concerns relate to the management of data. Traditional access control is application and principal/role specific, applied at policy enforcement points, after which there is no subsequent control over where data flows; a crucial issue once data has left its owner's control by cloud-hosted applications and within cloud-services. Information Flow Control (IFC), in addition, offers system-wide, end-to-end, flow control based on the properties of the data. We discuss the potential of cloud-deployed IFC for enforcing owners' dataflow policy with regard to protection and sharing, as well as safeguarding against malicious or buggy software. In addition, the audit log associated with IFC provides transparency, giving configurable system-wide visibility over data flows. [...]
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversightcited by 5
- 2022Enhancing the Security & Privacy of Wearable Brain-Computer Interfacescited by 2
- 2024Perennial Semantic Data Terms of Use for Decentralized Webcited by 2
- 2021Dr.Aid: Supporting Data-governance Rule Compliance for Decentralized Collaboration in an Automated Waycited by 1
- 2021An Automated Framework for Supporting Data-Governance Rule Compliance in Decentralized MIMO Contextscited by 0
- 2025Accountability Capture: How Record-Keeping to Support AI Transparency and Accountability (Re)shapes Algorithmic Oversight6 Oct 2025
- 2024Perennial Semantic Data Terms of Use for Decentralized Web12 Mar 2024
- 2022Enhancing the Security & Privacy of Wearable Brain-Computer Interfaces19 Jan 2022
- 2021Dr.Aid: Supporting Data-governance Rule Compliance for Decentralized Collaboration in an Automated Way3 Oct 2021
- 2021An Automated Framework for Supporting Data-Governance Rule Compliance in Decentralized MIMO Contexts2 Sep 2021