Sparsity and cosparsity for audio declipping: a flexible non-convex approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work investigates the empirical performance of the sparse synthesis versus sparse analysis regularization for the ill-posed inverse problem of audio declipping. We develop a versatile non-convex heuristics which can be readily used with both data models. Based on this algorithm, we report that, in most cases, the two models perform almost similarly in terms of signal enhancement. However, the analysis version is shown to be amenable for real time audio processing, when certain analysis operators are considered. Both versions outperform state-of-the-art methods in the field, especially for the severely saturated signals.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Solving Audio Inverse Problems with a Diffusion Modelcited by 62
- 2022Distortion Audio Effects: Learning How to Recover the Clean Signalcited by 4
- 2024Gaussian Flow Bridges for Audio Domain Transfer with Unpaired Datacited by 3
- 2021Active Restoration of Lost Audio Signals Using Machine Learning and Latent Informationcited by 0
- 2024Gaussian Flow Bridges for Audio Domain Transfer with Unpaired Data29 May 2024
- 2022Solving Audio Inverse Problems with a Diffusion Model27 Oct 2022
- 2022Distortion Audio Effects: Learning How to Recover the Clean Signal3 Feb 2022
- 2021Active Restoration of Lost Audio Signals Using Machine Learning and Latent Information21 Nov 2021