mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Configurable SAT Solver Challenge (CSSC)

arXiv 1505.01221 ↗First posted 5 May 2015cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well known that different solution strategies work well for different types of instances of hard combinatorial problems. As a consequence, most solvers for the propositional satisfiability problem (SAT) expose parameters that allow them to be customized to a particular family of instances. In the international SAT competition series, these parameters are ignored: solvers are run using a single default parameter setting (supplied by the authors) for all benchmark instances in a given track. While this competition format rewards solvers with robust default settings, it does not reflect the situation faced by a practitioner who only cares about performance on one particular application and can invest some time into tuning solver parameters for this application. The new Configurable SAT Solver Competition (CSSC) compares solvers in this latter setting, scoring each solver by the performance it achieved after a fully automated configuration step. This article describes the CSSC in more detail, and reports the results obtained in its two instantiations so far, CSSC 2013 and 2014.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 May 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

9 papers.