mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing binary classifiers using only positive and unlabeled data

arXiv 1504.06837 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2015stat.ML cs.IR cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Assessing the performance of a learned model is a crucial part of machine learning. However, in some domains only positive and unlabeled examples are available, which prohibits the use of most standard evaluation metrics. We propose an approach to estimate any metric based on contingency tables, including ROC and PR curves, using only positive and unlabeled data. Estimating these performance metrics is essentially reduced to estimating the fraction of (latent) positives in the unlabeled set, assuming known positives are a random sample of all positives. We provide theoretical bounds on the quality of our estimates, illustrate the importance of estimating the fraction of positives in the unlabeled set and demonstrate empirically that we are able to reliably estimate ROC and PR curves on real data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.