mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

The Normalization of Occurrence and Co-occurrence Matrices in Bibliometrics using Cosine Similarities and Ochiai Coefficients

arXiv 1503.08944 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2015cs.DLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We prove that Ochiai similarity of the co-occurrence matrix is equal to cosine similarity in the underlying occurrence matrix. Neither the cosine nor the Pearson correlation should be used for the normalization of co-occurrence matrices because the similarity is then normalized twice, and therefore over-estimated; the Ochiai coefficient can be used instead. Results are shown using a small matrix (5 cases, 4 variables) for didactic reasons, and also Ahlgren et al.'s (2003) co-occurrence matrix of 24 authors in library and information sciences. The over-estimation is shown numerically and will be illustrated using multidimensional scaling and cluster dendograms. If the occurrence matrix is not available (such as in internet research or author co-citation analysis) using Ochiai for the normalization is preferable to using the cosine.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

2 papers.