Change point analysis of second order characteristics in non-stationary time series
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
An important assumption in the work on testing for structural breaks in time series consists in the fact that the model is formulated such that the stochastic process under the null hypothesis of "no change-point" is stationary. This assumption is crucial to derive (asymptotic) critical values for the corresponding testing procedures using an elegant and powerful mathematical theory, but it might be not very realistic from a practical point of view. This paper develops change point analysis under less restrictive assumptions and deals with the problem of detecting change points in the marginal variance and correlation structures of a non-stationary time series. A CUSUM approach is proposed, which is used to test the "classical" hypothesis of the form H0: θ1=θ2 vs. H1: θ1 not =θ2, where θ1 and θ2 denote second order parameters of the process before and after a change point. The asymptotic distribution of the CUSUM test statistic is derived under the null hypothesis. This distribution depends in a complicated way on the dependency structure of the nonlinear non-stationary time series and a bootstrap approach is developed to generate critical values. The results are then extended to test the hypothesis of a it non relevant change point, i.e. H0: | θ1-θ2 | ≤ δ, which reflects the fact that inference should not be changed, if the difference between the parameters before and after the change-point is small. In contrast to previous work, our approach does neither require the mean to be constant nor - in the case of testing for lag k-correlation - that the mean, variance and fourth order joint cumulants are constant under the null hypothesis. In particular, we allow that the variance has a change point at a different location than the auto-covariance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
- 2021Time Series Analysis and Modeling to Forecast: a Surveycited by 5
- 2021Time Series Analysis and Modeling to Forecast: a Survey31 Mar 2021