Pure Nash Equilibria in Concurrent Deterministic Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study pure-strategy Nash equilibria in multi-player concurrent deterministic games, for a variety of preference relations. We provide a novel construction, called the suspect game, which transforms a multi-player concurrent game into a two-player turn-based game which turns Nash equilibria into winning strategies (for some objective that depends on the preference relations of the players in the original game). We use that transformation to design algorithms for computing Nash equilibria in finite games, which in most cases have optimal worst-case complexity, for large classes of preference relations. This includes the purely qualitative framework, where each player has a single omega-regular objective that she wants to satisfy, but also the larger class of semi-quantitative objectives, where each player has several omega-regular objectives equipped with a preorder (for instance, a player may want to satisfy all her objectives, or to maximise the number of objectives that she achieves.)
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Equilibrium Design for Concurrent Gamescited by 2
- 2021Rational Verification for Probabilistic Systemscited by 1
- 2024Synthesis of Reward Machines for Multi-Agent Equilibrium Design (Full Version)cited by 0
- 2024Synthesis of Reward Machines for Multi-Agent Equilibrium Design (Full Version)19 Aug 2024
- 2021Rational Verification for Probabilistic Systems19 Jul 2021
- 2021Equilibrium Design for Concurrent Games18 Jun 2021