To Drop or Not to Drop: Robustness, Consistency and Differential Privacy Properties of Dropout
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training deep belief networks (DBNs) requires optimizing a non-convex function with an extremely large number of parameters. Naturally, existing gradient descent (GD) based methods are prone to arbitrarily poor local minima. In this paper, we rigorously show that such local minima can be avoided (upto an approximation error) by using the dropout technique, a widely used heuristic in this domain. In particular, we show that by randomly dropping a few nodes of a one-hidden layer neural network, the training objective function, up to a certain approximation error, decreases by a multiplicative factor. On the flip side, we show that for training convex empirical risk minimizers (ERM), dropout in fact acts as a "stabilizer" or regularizer. That is, a simple dropout based GD method for convex ERMs is stable in the face of arbitrary changes to any one of the training points. Using the above assertion, we show that dropout provides fast rates for generalization error in learning (convex) generalized linear models (GLM). Moreover, using the above mentioned stability properties of dropout, we design dropout based differentially private algorithms for solving ERMs. The learned GLM thus, preserves privacy of each of the individual training points while providing accurate predictions for new test points. Finally, we empirically validate our stability assertions for dropout in the context of convex ERMs and show that surprisingly, dropout significantly outperforms (in terms of prediction accuracy) the L2 regularization based methods for several benchmark datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Reflash Dropout in Image Super-Resolutioncited by 41
- 2022On the utility and protection of optimization with differential privacy and classic regularization techniquescited by 10
- 2024Publishing Neural Networks in Drug Discovery Might Compromise Training Data Privacycited by 3
- 2026Communication-Efficient Federated AUC Maximization with Cyclic Client Participationcited by 0
- 2026Communication-Efficient Federated AUC Maximization with Cyclic Client Participation4 Jan 2026
- 2024Publishing Neural Networks in Drug Discovery Might Compromise Training Data Privacy22 Oct 2024
- 2022On the utility and protection of optimization with differential privacy and classic regularization techniques7 Sep 2022
- 2021Reflash Dropout in Image Super-Resolution22 Dec 2021