mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reproducible Research Can Still Be Wrong: Adopting a Prevention Approach

arXiv 1502.03169 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2015stat.AP cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reproducibility, the ability to recompute results, and replicability, the chances other experimenters will achieve a consistent result, are two foundational characteristics of successful scientific research. Consistent findings from independent investigators are the primary means by which scientific evidence accumulates for or against an hypothesis. And yet, of late there has been a crisis of confidence among researchers worried about the rate at which studies are either reproducible or replicable. In order to maintain the integrity of science research and maintain the public's trust in science, the scientific community must ensure reproducibility and replicability by engaging in a more preventative approach that greatly expands data analysis education and routinely employs software tools.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.