mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust and Effective Malware Detection through Quantitative Data Flow Graph Metrics

arXiv 1502.01609 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2015cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel malware detection approach based on metrics over quantitative data flow graphs. Quantitative data flow graphs (QDFGs) model process behavior by interpreting issued system calls as aggregations of quantifiable data flows.Due to the high abstraction level we consider QDFG metric based detection more robust against typical behavior obfuscation like bogus call injection or call reordering than other common behavioral models that base on raw system calls. We support this claim with experiments on obfuscated malware logs and demonstrate the superior obfuscation robustness in comparison to detection using n-grams. Our evaluations on a large and diverse data set consisting of about 7000 malware and 500 goodware samples show an average detection rate of 98.01% and a false positive rate of 0.48%. Moreover, we show that our approach is able to detect new malware (i.e. samples from malware families not included in the training set) and that the consideration of quantities in itself significantly improves detection precision.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.

2 papers.