The Fundamental Incompatibility of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Data Subsampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Leveraging the coherent exploration of Hamiltonian flow, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo produces computationally efficient Monte Carlo estimators, even with respect to complex and high-dimensional target distributions. When confronted with data-intensive applications, however, the algorithm may be too expensive to implement, leaving us to consider the utility of approximations such as data subsampling. In this paper I demonstrate how data subsampling fundamentally compromises the efficient exploration of Hamiltonian flow and hence the scalable performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo itself.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 2.
7 papers.
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2022Bayesian inference via sparse Hamiltonian flowscited by 12
- 2022Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinementcited by 9
- 2021Decentralized Bayesian Learning with Metropolis-Adjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 4
- 2022Variational Inference with Locally Enhanced Bounds for Hierarchical Modelscited by 4
- 2023Bayesian Pseudo-Coresets via Contrastive Divergencecited by 4
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computationcited by 4
- 2023Machine Learning and the Future of Bayesian Computation21 Apr 2023
- 2023Bayesian Pseudo-Coresets via Contrastive Divergence20 Mar 2023
- 2022Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinement18 Mar 2022
- 2022Bayesian inference via sparse Hamiltonian flows11 Mar 2022
- 2022Variational Inference with Locally Enhanced Bounds for Hierarchical Models8 Mar 2022
- 2021Decentralized Bayesian Learning with Metropolis-Adjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlo15 Jul 2021
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?29 Apr 2021