mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Analysis of Unsupervised Pre-training in Light of Recent Advances

arXiv 1412.6597 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2014cs.CV cs.LG cs.NEcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional neural networks perform well on object recognition because of a number of recent advances: rectified linear units (ReLUs), data augmentation, dropout, and large labelled datasets. Unsupervised data has been proposed as another way to improve performance. Unfortunately, unsupervised pre-training is not used by state-of-the-art methods leading to the following question: Is unsupervised pre-training still useful given recent advances? If so, when? We answer this in three parts: we 1) develop an unsupervised method that incorporates ReLUs and recent unsupervised regularization techniques, 2) analyze the benefits of unsupervised pre-training compared to data augmentation and dropout on CIFAR-10 while varying the ratio of unsupervised to supervised samples, 3) verify our findings on STL-10. We discover unsupervised pre-training, as expected, helps when the ratio of unsupervised to supervised samples is high, and surprisingly, hurts when the ratio is low. We also use unsupervised pre-training with additional color augmentation to achieve near state-of-the-art performance on STL-10.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

8 papers.