mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Opinion control in complex networks

arXiv 1412.2170 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2014physics.soc-ph cs.SIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many instances of election, the electorate appears to be a composite of partisan and independent voters. Given that partisans are not likely to convert to a different party, a main goal for a party could be to mobilize independent voters toward the party with the help of strong leadership, mass media, partisans, and effects of peer-to-peer influence. Based on the exact solution of the classical voter model dynamics in the presence of perfectly partisan voters (i.e., zealots), we propose a computational method to maximize the share of the party in a social network of independent voters by pinning control strategy. The party, corresponding to the controller or zealots, optimizes the nodes to be controlled given the information about the connectivity of independent voters and the set of nodes that the opponent party controls. We show that controlling hubs is generally a good strategy, whereas the optimized strategy is even better. The superiority of the optimized strategy is particularly eminent when the independent voters are connected as directed rather than undirected networks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.