Constant Step Size Least-Mean-Square: Bias-Variance Trade-offs and Optimal Sampling Distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the least-squares regression problem and provide a detailed asymptotic analysis of the performance of averaged constant-step-size stochastic gradient descent (a.k.a. least-mean-squares). In the strongly-convex case, we provide an asymptotic expansion up to explicit exponentially decaying terms. Our analysis leads to new insights into stochastic approximation algorithms: (a) it gives a tighter bound on the allowed step-size; (b) the generalization error may be divided into a variance term which is decaying as O(1/n), independently of the step-size γ, and a bias term that decays as O(1/γ 2 n 2); (c) when allowing non-uniform sampling, the choice of a good sampling density depends on whether the variance or bias terms dominate. In particular, when the variance term dominates, optimal sampling densities do not lead to much gain, while when the bias term dominates, we can choose larger step-sizes that leads to significant improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.