False discovery rate smoothing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present false discovery rate smoothing, an empirical-Bayes method for exploiting spatial structure in large multiple-testing problems. FDR smoothing automatically finds spatially localized regions of significant test statistics. It then relaxes the threshold of statistical significance within these regions, and tightens it elsewhere, in a manner that controls the overall false-discovery rate at a given level. This results in increased power and cleaner spatial separation of signals from noise. The approach requires solving a non-standard high-dimensional optimization problem, for which an efficient augmented-Lagrangian algorithm is presented. In simulation studies, FDR smoothing exhibits state-of-the-art performance at modest computational cost. In particular, it is shown to be far more robust than existing methods for spatially dependent multiple testing. We also apply the method to a data set from an fMRI experiment on spatial working memory, where it detects patterns that are much more biologically plausible than those detected by standard FDR-controlling methods. All code for FDR smoothing is publicly available in Python and R.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Lattice partition recovery with dyadic CARTcited by 2
- 2022Variance estimation in graphs with the fused lassocited by 2
- 2021Multiple Hypothesis Testing Framework for Spatial Signalscited by 1
- 2023DeepFDR: A Deep Learning-based False Discovery Rate Control Method for Neuroimaging Datacited by 1
- 2025Treatment response as a latent variablecited by 1
- 2026Controlling False Discovery in Arbitrarily Structured Hypothesis Spaces via Reproducing Kernelscited by 1
- 2025A False Discovery Rate Control Method Using a Fully Connected Hidden Markov Random Field for Neuroimaging Datacited by 0
- 2026Finite Resources False Discovery Rate Control in Structured Hypothesis Spacescited by 0
- 2026Finite Resources False Discovery Rate Control in Structured Hypothesis Spaces13 Jun 2026
- 2026Controlling False Discovery in Arbitrarily Structured Hypothesis Spaces via Reproducing Kernels17 May 2026
- 2025A False Discovery Rate Control Method Using a Fully Connected Hidden Markov Random Field for Neuroimaging Data27 May 2025
- 2025Treatment response as a latent variable12 Feb 2025
- 2023DeepFDR: A Deep Learning-based False Discovery Rate Control Method for Neuroimaging Data20 Oct 2023
- 2022Variance estimation in graphs with the fused lasso26 Jul 2022
- 2021Multiple Hypothesis Testing Framework for Spatial Signals27 Aug 2021
- 2021Lattice partition recovery with dyadic CART27 May 2021