Differentially Private Distributed Constrained Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many resource allocation problems can be formulated as an optimization problem whose constraints contain sensitive information about participating users. This paper concerns solving this kind of optimization problem in a distributed manner while protecting the privacy of user information. Without privacy considerations, existing distributed algorithms normally consist in a central entity computing and broadcasting certain public coordination signals to participating users. However, the coordination signals often depend on user information, so that an adversary who has access to the coordination signals can potentially decode information on individual users and put user privacy at risk. We present a distributed optimization algorithm that preserves differential privacy, which is a strong notion that guarantees user privacy regardless of any auxiliary information an adversary may have. The algorithm achieves privacy by perturbing the public signals with additive noise, whose magnitude is determined by the sensitivity of the projection operation onto user-specified constraints. By viewing the differentially private algorithm as an implementation of stochastic gradient descent, we are able to derive a bound for the suboptimality of the algorithm. We illustrate the implementation of our algorithm via a case study of electric vehicle charging. Specifically, we derive the sensitivity and present numerical simulations for the algorithm. Through numerical simulations, we are able to investigate various aspects of the algorithm when being used in practice, including the choice of step size, number of iterations, and the trade-off between privacy level and suboptimality.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
- 2021Communication efficient privacy-preserving distributed optimization using adaptive differential quantizationcited by 6
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learningcited by 4
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challengescited by 4
- 2024Enhancing Privacy in Federated Learning through Local Trainingcited by 3
- 2023Differential Privacy via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimization and Learningcited by 2
- 2023Locally Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning with Guaranteed Optimalitycited by 1
- 2021Realistic Differentially-Private Transmission Power Flow Data Releasecited by 0
- 2023Privacy-Preserving Matrix Factorization for Recommendation Systems using Gaussian Mechanismcited by 0
- 2023Near-optimal Differentially Private Client Selection in Federated Settingscited by 0
- 2025From Centralized to Decentralized Federated Learning: Theoretical Insights, Privacy Preservation, and Robustness Challenges10 Mar 2025
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learning16 Aug 2024
- 2024Enhancing Privacy in Federated Learning through Local Training26 Mar 2024
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Distributed Optimization and Learning29 Feb 2024
- 2023Near-optimal Differentially Private Client Selection in Federated Settings13 Oct 2023
- 2023Locally Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning with Guaranteed Optimality25 Jun 2023
- 2023Differential Privacy via Distributionally Robust Optimization25 Apr 2023
- 2023Privacy-Preserving Matrix Factorization for Recommendation Systems using Gaussian Mechanism11 Apr 2023
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices4 Oct 2021
- 2021Communication efficient privacy-preserving distributed optimization using adaptive differential quantization30 May 2021
- 2021Realistic Differentially-Private Transmission Power Flow Data Release25 Mar 2021