Learning circuits with few negations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Monotone Boolean functions, and the monotone Boolean circuits that compute them, have been intensively studied in complexity theory. In this paper we study the structure of Boolean functions in terms of the minimum number of negations in any circuit computing them, a complexity measure that interpolates between monotone functions and the class of all functions. We study this generalization of monotonicity from the vantage point of learning theory, giving near-matching upper and lower bounds on the uniform-distribution learnability of circuits in terms of the number of negations they contain. Our upper bounds are based on a new structural characterization of negation-limited circuits that extends a classical result of A. A. Markov. Our lower bounds, which employ Fourier-analytic tools from hardness amplification, give new results even for circuits with no negations (i.e. monotone functions).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
- 2025The Power of Iterative Filtering for Supervised Learning with (Heavy) Contaminationcited by 7
- 2025The Probably Approximately Correct Learning Model in Computational Learning Theorycited by 3
- 2025On Exact Learning of d-Monotone Functionscited by 1
- 2022New Distinguishers for Negation-Limited Weak Pseudorandom Functionscited by 0
- 2025The Probably Approximately Correct Learning Model in Computational Learning Theory11 Nov 2025
- 2025The Power of Iterative Filtering for Supervised Learning with (Heavy) Contamination26 May 2025
- 2025On Exact Learning of d-Monotone Functions3 Feb 2025
- 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithms14 Apr 2022
- 2022New Distinguishers for Negation-Limited Weak Pseudorandom Functions23 Mar 2022