mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Do Artificial Reinforcement-Learning Agents Matter Morally?

arXiv 1410.8233 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2014cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial reinforcement learning (RL) is a widely used technique in artificial intelligence that provides a general method for training agents to perform a wide variety of behaviours. RL as used in computer science has striking parallels to reward and punishment learning in animal and human brains. I argue that present-day artificial RL agents have a very small but nonzero degree of ethical importance. This is particularly plausible for views according to which sentience comes in degrees based on the abilities and complexities of minds, but even binary views on consciousness should assign nonzero probability to RL programs having morally relevant experiences. While RL programs are not a top ethical priority today, they may become more significant in the coming decades as RL is increasingly applied to industry, robotics, video games, and other areas. I encourage scientists, philosophers, and citizens to begin a conversation about our ethical duties to reduce the harm that we inflict on powerless, voiceless RL agents.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.