The Matthew effect in empirical data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Matthew effect describes the phenomenon that in societies the rich tend to get richer and the potent even more powerful. It is closely related to the concept of preferential attachment in network science, where the more connected nodes are destined to acquire many more links in the future than the auxiliary nodes. Cumulative advantage and success-breads-success also both describe the fact that advantage tends to beget further advantage. The concept is behind the many power laws and scaling behaviour in empirical data, and it is at the heart of self-organization across social and natural sciences. Here we review the methodology for measuring preferential attachment in empirical data, as well as the observations of the Matthew effect in patterns of scientific collaboration, socio-technical and biological networks, the propagation of citations, the emergence of scientific progress and impact, career longevity, the evolution of common English words and phrases, as well as in education and brain development. We also discuss whether the Matthew effect is due to chance or optimisation, for example related to homophily in social systems or efficacy in technological systems, and we outline possible directions for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2023ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishingcited by 51
- 2021Device-Cloud Collaborative Learning for Recommendationcited by 34
- 2024Complex systems approach to natural languagecited by 12
- 2023Causal Lifting and Link Predictioncited by 5
- 2025Leveraging LLM-based agents for social science research: insights from citation network simulationscited by 5
- 2025Scholar Inbox: Personalized Paper Recommendations for Scientistscited by 3
- 2021Quantifying the Global Support Network for Non-State Armed Groups (NAGs)cited by 0
- 2025Weak Supervision for Improved Precision in Search Systemscited by 0
- 2026A Multi-View Consistency Framework with Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026Whose fairness? Structural concentration in AI bias researchcited by 0
- 2026Whose fairness? Structural concentration in AI bias research6 Jul 2026
- 2026A Multi-View Consistency Framework with Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation27 Jan 2026
- 2025Leveraging LLM-based agents for social science research: insights from citation network simulations5 Nov 2025
- 2025Scholar Inbox: Personalized Paper Recommendations for Scientists11 Apr 2025
- 2025Weak Supervision for Improved Precision in Search Systems10 Mar 2025
- 2024Complex systems approach to natural language5 Jan 2024
- 2023ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing21 Mar 2023
- 2023Causal Lifting and Link Prediction2 Feb 2023
- 2021Device-Cloud Collaborative Learning for Recommendation14 Apr 2021
- 2021Quantifying the Global Support Network for Non-State Armed Groups (NAGs)31 Jan 2021