A Logic for Reasoning about Evidence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a logic for reasoning about evidence, that essentially views evidence as a function from prior beliefs (before making an observation) to posterior beliefs (after making the observation). We provide a sound and complete axiomatization for the logic, and consider the complexity of the decision problem. Although the reasoning in the logic is mainly propositional, we allow variables representing numbers and quantification over them. This expressive power seems necessary to capture important properties of evidence
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Ceci n'est pas une pipe: AI systems as semantic abstractions10 Jul 2026