Understanding the group dynamics and success of teams
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex problems often require coordinated group effort and can consume significant resources, yet our understanding of how teams form and succeed has been limited by a lack of large-scale, quantitative data. We analyze activity traces and success levels for ~150,000 self-organized, online team projects. While larger teams tend to be more successful, workload is highly focused across the team, with only a few members performing most work. We find that highly successful teams are significantly more focused than average teams of the same size, that their members have worked on more diverse sets of projects, and the members of highly successful teams are more likely to be core members or 'leads' of other teams. The relations between team success and size, focus and especially team experience cannot be explained by confounding factors such as team age, external contributions from non-team members, nor by group mechanisms such as social loafing. Taken together, these features point to organizational principles that may maximize the success of collaborative endeavors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022LAGOON: An Analysis Tool for Open Source Communitiescited by 0
- 2022LAGOON: An Analysis Tool for Open Source Communities26 Jan 2022