Authorship Attribution through Function Word Adjacency Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A method for authorship attribution based on function word adjacency networks (WANs) is introduced. Function words are parts of speech that express grammatical relationships between other words but do not carry lexical meaning on their own. In the WANs in this paper, nodes are function words and directed edges stand in for the likelihood of finding the sink word in the ordered vicinity of the source word. WANs of different authors can be interpreted as transition probabilities of a Markov chain and are therefore compared in terms of their relative entropies. Optimal selection of WAN parameters is studied and attribution accuracy is benchmarked across a diverse pool of authors and varying text lengths. This analysis shows that, since function words are independent of content, their use tends to be specific to an author and that the relational data captured by function WANs is a good summary of stylometric fingerprints. Attribution accuracy is observed to exceed the one achieved by methods that rely on word frequencies alone. Further combining WANs with methods that rely on word frequencies alone, results in larger attribution accuracy, indicating that both sources of information encode different aspects of authorial styles.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
10 papers.
- 2025Diversity-Enhanced Reasoning for Subjective Questionscited by 9
- 2021Node-Variant Graph Filters in Graph Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2022Text characterization based on recurrence networkscited by 4
- 2023Who could be behind QAnon? Authorship attribution with supervised machine-learningcited by 2
- 2023On the Trade-Off between Stability and Representational Capacity in Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025How Well Do LLMs Imitate Human Writing Style?cited by 2
- 2023Authorship identification under domain shift: a survey of stylistic measures and learned author representationscited by 1
- 2026Average shortest-path length in word-adjacency networks: Chinese versus Englishcited by 0
- 2026Non-Zipfian Distribution of Stopwords or Function Words and Subset Selection Modelscited by 0
- 2026Creative Transformation in Literary Texts: Modelling Change Across Representational Levelscited by 0
- 2026Creative Transformation in Literary Texts: Modelling Change Across Representational Levels30 Jul 2026
- 2026Non-Zipfian Distribution of Stopwords or Function Words and Subset Selection Models5 Mar 2026
- 2026Average shortest-path length in word-adjacency networks: Chinese versus English10 Jan 2026
- 2025How Well Do LLMs Imitate Human Writing Style?29 Sep 2025
- 2025Diversity-Enhanced Reasoning for Subjective Questions27 Jul 2025
- 2023On the Trade-Off between Stability and Representational Capacity in Graph Neural Networks4 Dec 2023
- 2023Authorship identification under domain shift: a survey of stylistic measures and learned author representations30 Sep 2023
- 2023Who could be behind QAnon? Authorship attribution with supervised machine-learning3 Mar 2023
- 2022Text characterization based on recurrence networks17 Jan 2022
- 2021Node-Variant Graph Filters in Graph Neural Networks31 May 2021