On Classification with Bags, Groups and Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many classification problems can be difficult to formulate directly in terms of the traditional supervised setting, where both training and test samples are individual feature vectors. There are cases in which samples are better described by sets of feature vectors, that labels are only available for sets rather than individual samples, or, if individual labels are available, that these are not independent. To better deal with such problems, several extensions of supervised learning have been proposed, where either training and/or test objects are sets of feature vectors. However, having been proposed rather independently of each other, their mutual similarities and differences have hitherto not been mapped out. In this work, we provide an overview of such learning scenarios, propose a taxonomy to illustrate the relationships between them, and discuss directions for further research in these areas.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Training image classifiers using Semi-Weak Label Datacited by 2
- 2024A prototype-based model for set classificationcited by 2
- 2021Weakly Supervised Classification Using Group-Level Labelscited by 0
- 2024A prototype-based model for set classification25 Aug 2024
- 2021Weakly Supervised Classification Using Group-Level Labels16 Aug 2021
- 2021Training image classifiers using Semi-Weak Label Data19 Mar 2021