mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Approximate resilience, monotonicity, and the complexity of agnostic learning

arXiv 1405.5268 ↗First posted 21 May 2014cs.LG cs.CC cs.DMcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A function f is d-resilient if all its Fourier coefficients of degree at most d are zero, i.e., f is uncorrelated with all low-degree parities. We study the notion of mathitapproximate mathitresilience of Boolean functions, where we say that f is α-approximately d-resilient if f is α-close to a [-1,1]-valued d-resilient function in ℓ1 distance. We show that approximate resilience essentially characterizes the complexity of agnostic learning of a concept class C over the uniform distribution. Roughly speaking, if all functions in a class C are far from being d-resilient then C can be learned agnostically in time nO(d) and conversely, if C contains a function close to being d-resilient then agnostic learning of C in the statistical query (SQ) framework of Kearns has complexity of at least nOmega(d). This characterization is based on the duality between ℓ1 approximation by degree-d polynomials and approximate d-resilience that we establish. In particular, it implies that ℓ1 approximation by low-degree polynomials, known to be sufficient for agnostic learning over product distributions, is in fact necessary. Focusing on monotone Boolean functions, we exhibit the existence of near-optimal α-approximately widetildeOmega(α√n)-resilient monotone functions for all α>0. Prior to our work, it was conceivable even that every monotone function is Omega(1)-far from any 1-resilient function. Furthermore, we construct simple, explicit monotone functions based on sf Tribes and sf CycleRun that are close to highly resilient functions. Our constructions are based on a fairly general resilience analysis and amplification. These structural results, together with the characterization, imply nearly optimal lower bounds for agnostic learning of monotone juntas.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 May 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021The Optimality of Polynomial Regression for Agnostic Learning under Gaussian Marginalscited by 52
  2. 2023Near-Optimal Cryptographic Hardness of Agnostically Learning Halfspaces and ReLU Regression under Gaussian Marginalscited by 31
  3. 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
  4. 2021Learning General Halfspaces with General Massart Noise under the Gaussian Distributioncited by 27
  5. 2024Adaptive and oblivious statistical adversaries are equivalentcited by 9
  6. 2025The Power of Iterative Filtering for Supervised Learning with (Heavy) Contaminationcited by 7
  7. 2022Near-Optimal Statistical Query Lower Bounds for Agnostically Learning Intersections of Halfspaces with Gaussian Marginalscited by 6
  8. 2022Optimal SQ Lower Bounds for Robustly Learning Discrete Product Distributions and Ising Modelscited by 4
  9. 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3
  10. 2026Sandwiching Polynomials for Geometric Concepts with Low Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 3
  11. 2025Noise Sensitivity and Learning Lower Bounds for Hierarchical Functionscited by 2
  12. 2025A Fully Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Robustly Learning Halfspaces over the Hypercubecited by 1
4 more
  1. 2022New Distinguishers for Negation-Limited Weak Pseudorandom Functionscited by 0
  2. 2025Faster Algorithms for Agnostically Learning Disjunctions and their Implicationscited by 0
  3. 2026A Near-optimal SQ Lower Bound for Smoothed Agnostic Learning of Boolean Halfspacescited by 0
  4. 2026Efficient Robust Learning at the Information-Theoretic Limitcited by 0