mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computer-Aided Proof of Erdos Discrepancy Properties

arXiv 1405.3097 ↗First posted 13 May 2014cs.DM cs.LOcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In 1930s Paul Erdos conjectured that for any positive integer C in any infinite ± 1 sequence (xn) there exists a subsequence xd, x2d, x3d,dots, xkd, for some positive integers k and d, such that mid sumi=1k xi· d mid >C. The conjecture has been referred to as one of the major open problems in combinatorial number theory and discrepancy theory. For the particular case of C=1 a human proof of the conjecture exists; for C=2 a bespoke computer program had generated sequences of length 1124 of discrepancy 2, but the status of the conjecture remained open even for such a small bound. We show that by encoding the problem into Boolean satisfiability and applying the state of the art SAT solvers, one can obtain a discrepancy 2 sequence of length 1160 and a proof of the ErdHos discrepancy conjecture for C=2, claiming that no discrepancy 2 sequence of length 1161, or more, exists. In the similar way, we obtain a precise bound of 127,645 on the maximal lengths of both multiplicative and completely multiplicative sequences of discrepancy 3. We also demonstrate that unrestricted discrepancy 3 sequences can be longer than 130,000.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 May 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.