mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Auto-encoders: reconstruction versus compression

arXiv 1403.7752 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2014cs.NE cs.IT cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We discuss the similarities and differences between training an auto-encoder to minimize the reconstruction error, and training the same auto-encoder to compress the data via a generative model. Minimizing a codelength for the data using an auto-encoder is equivalent to minimizing the reconstruction error plus some correcting terms which have an interpretation as either a denoising or contractive property of the decoding function. These terms are related but not identical to those used in denoising or contractive auto-encoders [Vincent et al. 2010, Rifai et al. 2011]. In particular, the codelength viewpoint fully determines an optimal noise level for the denoising criterion.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.