mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating topic coherence measures

arXiv 1403.6397 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2014cs.LG cs.CL cs.IRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Topic models extract representative word sets - called topics - from word counts in documents without requiring any semantic annotations. Topics are not guaranteed to be well interpretable, therefore, coherence measures have been proposed to distinguish between good and bad topics. Studies of topic coherence so far are limited to measures that score pairs of individual words. For the first time, we include coherence measures from scientific philosophy that score pairs of more complex word subsets and apply them to topic scoring.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.